[Tagdb] Tags and data storage
Erik Hatcher
esh6h at virginia.edu
Fri Mar 24 20:31:42 GMT 2006
On Mar 24, 2006, at 1:17 PM, Nitin Borwankar wrote:
> Not sure what is meant by "tags don't map to sql"
> A tag is an attribute so that is pretty well handled by SQL.
> If what is meant is that the tag calculus is not supported
> efficiently by SQL *built in* predicates and functions
> then I might agree.
>
> Google's < a href="http://labs.google.com/papers/mapreduce-
> osdi04.pdf">map reduce </a> may be useful here
Or if you can't get enough of the "Lucene" brand, how 'bout the open
source version:
<http://lucene.apache.org/hadoop/>
This is perhaps on the extreme end of folksonomy infrastructure and
to be honest I've never given thought to how MapReduce/Hadoop could
factor into my situation because it is so much more complex than I
have time to digest fully or to prototype with. But, others should
trail blaze in this arena - I fully expect there to be some pretty
special things that can be done here.
> Also what exactly is "partial indexing".
Good question. Perhaps it means that the data is stored in a
relational database in a normalized granular fashion, but indexed
into something like Lucene also for more sophisticated, faster, and
scalable querying.
It's a shame the underpinnings of del.icio.us are obscure, though I
can appreciate why that is as well.
Erik
More information about the Tagdb
mailing list