[Tagdb] TagCamp 2005 trip report

[Chris Lott]

On 11/7/05, Bill Ward <bill at wards.net> wrote:
> Tags: emailtags tagcamp
>
>  On 11/7/05, Chris Lott <chris.lott at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Wouldn't the best solution be an X-tag: header or something similar?
>
>  Yes, if the clients supported that.  Since they don't, we would need to
> support tagging in the message body or it's too much work to ever make it be
> widely adopted.


But no clients support the schema now, why not put them in the
(arguably) "right" place? Every client *allows* X-headers, don't they?

It just seems like the right way to go if you expect clients to--
eventually-- have a place for tags just as they now have a place for
subject, from, to, etc...

c