[Tagdb] Tag Planet?
Nitin Borwankar
nitin at borwankar.com
Wed Dec 14 05:25:51 GMT 2005
Colin Viebrock wrote:
> Oh well. :)
>
> For anyone who's interested, a working example using del is here:
>
> http://tagschema.viebrock.ca/
>
> - Colin
>
>
Now that you have it we could also have the other one using Simpy and
let people decide what they like more.
Who knows what will turn out better in practice and for what reason.
Nitin.
>
>
> On 13-Dec-05, at 3:43 PM, Nitin Borwankar wrote:
>
>>
>> Otis,
>>
>> Thanks for the update on Simpy - I asked a similar question so I'll
>> save you "the parrot ...".
>> Given this info about Simpy's capabilities my preference would be to
>> go with Simpy rather than del.
>> I'll let others chip in and we should come to a consensus shortly as
>> this is a badly needed service.
>> I agree that polluting the tag space is not the best way to go.
>> So do you want to show us how it's done, set up a group, etc.?
>>
>> In other news, I bought a copy of your (and Erik's) excellent Lucene
>> book .....
>> Good stuff.
>>
>> Nitin.
>>
>>
>>
>> ogjunk-tagdb at yahoo.com wrote:
>>
>>> Hello Philipp,
>>>
>>> --- Philipp Keller <phred at citrin.ch> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Hi there..
>>>>
>>>> Lately I read an (ahem) very positive remark about my blog:
>>>> "Philipp's
>>>> writings offer what is badly needed in most blogs on
>>>> tagging/"folksonomy"/social software/"Web 2.0" issues: substance."
>>>> [1]
>>>>
>>>
>>> I agree with that (I did read your post about tags from the other day,
>>> but have been to busy to respond properly).
>>>
>>>
>>>> and I stumbled on an article on 37signals about if we should put
>>>> comas
>>>> or spaces to separate tags (and this article gained quite a bit of
>>>> popularity..), I thought: "don't we have more interesting things to
>>>> talk
>>>> about?"
>>>>
>>>> I think there's a lack of a point/website/rss-feed where the good
>>>> articles about tagging come together. Tagging has so many facettes
>>>> that
>>>> are so interesting but it's a pity the good articles don't get as
>>>> much
>>>> attention as they'd need. Plus: I don't want to miss the good
>>>> articles
>>>> about tagging. I subscibed to del.icio.us/popular/tagging but it
>>>> doesn't solve the problem.
>>>>
>>>> Now, I thought about possible solutions:
>>>> 1) A thing like Planet RDF [3]: A site that consists of posts from a
>>>> few
>>>> blogs that concentrate on tagging. I suppose such sites are pretty
>>>> common..? The downside: bad signal/noise ratio
>>>>
>>>
>>> It's too much information for the busy me, but this is kind of related
>>> - http://planetweb.com/
>>>
>>>
>>>> 2) A clipping blog that is mostly fed with quotes from good articles
>>>> and
>>>> small reviews about good tagging articles, sort of "why should you
>>>> read that article"
>>>>
>>>
>>> That's what Simpy Groups are very good for - 1) bookmark the link, 2)
>>> tag it, 3) add the "why should I read that article"
>>>
>>>
>>>> 3) A common tag in del.icio.us or simpy (let's support the list
>>>> contributors) like for:lists.tagschema.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I don't like "for:" business. It polutes the "tag space". Again,
>>> this
>>> is what Simpy's Groups are very good for. Save a link, tag it,
>>> check N
>>> Groups that you want to share it with, and tags remain nice and clean.
>>>
>>>
>>>> I think it would be important to have a shared knowledgebase. Not
>>>> just a
>>>> single person thing, that's why I address this here on this list.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I don't want to sound like a parrot, but... :)
>>>
>>>
>>>> On the
>>>> other hand I don't want to have the "tag kids" posting. I don't want
>>>> to be informed about the 1354th tagging-site's opening.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Me neither. Parrot reference again....
>>>
>>>
>>>> I like option 2) the best but option 3) would be the easiest one..
>>>>
>>>> Do you have any suggestions?
>>>>
>>>
>>> I haven't read others' replies, but I can certainly recommend Simpy
>>> Groups for this type of work. That is what they were designed for -
>>> collaborative bookmarking, research, etc. I have a few groups, some I
>>> share with several people who are into Social Bookmarking, and I even
>>> have one I share with my wife for some stuff that's important to
>>> us. :)
>>>
>>> Groups support collaborative bookmarking+tagging, and it sounds like I
>>> should add some Wiki/Notes/Messaging features.... yes/no? Would that
>>> work for you here?
>>>
>>> Otis
>>>
>>>
>>>> greets
>>>> Philipp Keller
>>>>
>>>> [1] http://www.hebig.org/blogs/archives/main/002103.php
>>>> [2]
>>>>
>>>>
>>> http://37signals.com/svn/archives2/
>>> tag_formats_cant_we_all_just_get_along.php
>>>
>>>> [3] http://planetrdf.com/
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Tagdb mailing list
>>> Tagdb at lists.tagschema.com
>>> http://lists.tagschema.com/mailman/listinfo/tagdb
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tagdb mailing list
>> Tagdb at lists.tagschema.com
>> http://lists.tagschema.com/mailman/listinfo/tagdb
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagdb mailing list
> Tagdb at lists.tagschema.com
> http://lists.tagschema.com/mailman/listinfo/tagdb
More information about the Tagdb
mailing list